Skip to main content

Take Aways from AILTA2018

All Ireland Conference on Learning, Teaching and Assessment in Further and Higher Education


My day at AILTA started off wonderfully with a stroll to the venue through the autumn leaves on Griffith Avenue. I'd never been to Marino institute of Education before and was very impressed with the setting for this great conference.

In this blog post I couldn't possibly hope to cover even a small amount of the topics touched upon in today's conference. I'll just gather some reflections from talks that were particularly relevant to my own interests and practice.

There were a few key themes that struck me during the day. Firstly, as would be expected, there was a great emphasis on taking an evidence informed approach to your practice. Secondly, the idea of listening to student stories came up at several talks and discussions. Thirdly there was a lot of discussion around the difference between digital assessment vs. technology enhanced assessment. Fourthly, there were several mentions of over-assessment. The idea that students might be over-assessed seems to be an opinion that is gaining momentum at the moment and possibly become a bit of a "buzz". It's one I'm personally a bit afraid of because I really believe there is still a huge underuse of assessment as and for learning in the broader education community. I fear that people who are at the early stages of learning about the benefits of assessment might be put off by all this talk of over-assessment.

Supporting and Evidencing Student Transitions

Professor Roni Bamber from Queen Margaret University gave the first keynote of the day. I really enjoyed professor Bamber's talk and her relaxed and light style of presentation was great. For me the key takeaway from this talk was the idea there is not just one transition stage,  one student, one  transition element, one transition journey. We need to consider the needs of diverse groups of students at several different key times of transition, not just the transition "in" but also "through" and "out".  We heard about the idea of longitudinal induction and how it is pointless to continue heaping loads of information on students in the first week of college when we know that the information is not timely and that students can't possibly take it all in. I think it was all summed up very well with the quote "induction needs to be a process, not an event".

Building Supports That Help Learning in Further and Higher Education

Dr. Ciaran O' Mathuna presented work from his phD research. He spoke about Narrative research he conducted into how to support mature learners. Dr. O Mathuna described with great enthusiasm the joys and sadness of listening to people give their own stories of their life experiences and their feelings about going back to education. We also heard of some very practical difficulties that these students faced e.g. no catering facilities for night students and how this may have made them feel undervalued by their institution. Things that these students felt were helpful to them included physical access to academic staff and the choices they were given in relation to modules and assessments.

TEAM, Rubrics and Journal Club

For the 12.40 session I went to stream B. There was a great buzz in the room. All the talks were really interesting and the ensuing discussions were somehow really lively and open. Cathy Hannigan made us all do some work and made me reactivate the secondary school science teacher in me which has been lying dormant for quite a while. Cathy demonstrated very nicely the use of a rubric in correcting science lab write ups by asking us all to grade one with and without a rubric to guide us. The third speaker (I'm really sorry but I'm not sure whether it was Anne or Christine who presented) gave a great introduction to the idea of a journal club. The discussions after the talk revolved around the idea that it's so important to make expectations and standards explicit to students. There was also great debate around the use of marks to incentivise student participation and whether or not that was necessary or advisable. The other concept that emerged was that of transferability and that all the speakers in this stream were discussing student skills that should be transferable to other modules and later life.

Designing Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Modules: an Evidence Based Approach

Jennifer Bruen spoke about the design of a CLIL module where the focus is equally on the content and the language of instruction. She laid out the following 6 principles of best practice of CLIL.

  1. Language Support
  2. Opportunities for production ( the need to give opportunities to produce written and spoken content in the target language).
  3. Opportunities for collaborative group work and peer support.
  4. relaxed and participatory classroom atmosphere.
  5. Use the language of instruction ( only use English in certain set types of situation e.g. explaining a grammar point).
  6. Draw upon linguistic repertoires present (I loved this idea of using the language knowledge of the diverse students in the class).
Jennifer made the excellent point that given the language diversity within most classrooms at the moment perhaps we should all be thinking about these six principles. This certainly rang very true for me, teaching as I do within Griffith College, because we have a very large international student community.

The more you know, the more you want to know

I learned a lot during the course of Tuesday's conference. However, of course, I am also left with more questions that I need to reflect upon and learn more about. Some of these include
  • How can I help students I encounter transition through their course, how can I contribute some longitudinal induction?
  • I need to think more about listening to and evidencing student stories and using that to inform my practice.
  • I need to read up on Mezirow's Transformative Learning Theory and also andragogy.
  • I need to follow up with Michael Keane about his talk. I got a fit of coughing near the end of his talk and missed the conclusions. The topic was very relevant to me as a maths teacher and I'd like to know what suggestions were made for how to support the students missing mathematical knowledge.
  • Lightboard, oh yeah, bring it on! Looks perfect for making maths micro learning videos.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Visibly Random Groupings

About six months ago I was browsing on twitter when I came across some Maths education people tweeting about #VRG, #VNPS and #thinkingclassroom. This led me down a wonderful rabbit hole of figuring out what these mysterious acronyms stood for. In today’s blog post I’m going to focus on #VRG which, I discovered, stands for Visibly Random Groups. Visibly Random groups is an idea put forward by Peter Liljedahl.  Usually when it comes to carrying out some group work in the classroom there are two standard ways that the groups are formed. Either the students themselves pick the groups or the teacher picks the groups. When the teacher picks the groups, there is usually some underlying reason that the groups are assigned in this way. Perhaps the teacher wants to make sure that there is one strong student in each group. Or maybe the teacher wants to split up some students who tend to be chatty. When the students pick the groups they will tend to pick groups with their friends. In visib

5 reasons to use the Numbas e-assessment system for Mathematics

5 reasons to use the Numbas e-assessment system for Mathematics   I first learned about Numbas when Julie Crowley approached me in 2015 to do some work as project  assistant   for the teame (Transitioning to E-Assessment in Mathematics Education) Project. My first job was to test the existing questions that had been developed for use in two Cork HE Institutions. After that we did a lot of work on making it easier for other institutions to use the resources we had developed. We wrote an implementation guide  and tried to spread the word on how well this system can work. Numbas is a freely available e-assessment system for Mathematics that has been developed in Newcastle University. The Numbas system has a proven track record and a strong reputation (B. Foster 2012) and (Perfect 2015). It has been used in Cork Institute of Technology and University College Cork as well as at  Newcastle University (B. Foster 2012) , University of Leicester, and Kingston University, London (D

Domino Logic Gates. Fun and hands-on.

Domino logic Gates: A hands on lesson on boolean logic One of my favourite classes this year was one where we built domino Logic gates. We were seven weeks into a first year maths course for computer science students. We had been working through sets  then algebra and then Boolean Algebra. Each week we had one three hour lecture (horrific, right). In the seventh week there was the first in class test for the module and I knew that the students were going to be tired after doing the test and I needed to keep it "light" somehow for the remainder of the three hour period. I was also working with these same students in a module called Effective Learning and Development and from discussion in that module I knew that a few of the learners were the type of learner that liked to move and do hands on work (there was a time that I would have said they were learners with a kinesthetic learning style but I know that is all out of vogue at the moment). I had been thinking of ways to t